14 Comments
User's avatar
Stephen F.'s avatar

I love the way Emerson's sphere of influence is broadened here. I would also like to think of the appearance of "not-Ahab" in Chapter 44 not as an error, but a fully intentional manifestation of the inseparable existence of Ahab with Moby-Dick. The referenced passage from Chapter 42 sets us up for this nicely. Melville admired the "deep-diving" of Emerson; Ahab's out-of-body experience might be viewed as a wonderful anti-transcendental image of Emerson's "transparent eyeball" state. I have also reached the age of Ahab, and may now have to take the journey again myself. Thank you.

Expand full comment
Caleb Crain's avatar

Great idea to put Ahab's madness in parallel with the "transparent eyeball" passage. Thanks!

Expand full comment
Stephen F.'s avatar

Poor Ahab just can't tap into the "perpetual presence of the sublime" that RWE feels under the stars at night. His nighttime meditations take him to much darker places, eh?

Expand full comment
John Jeremiah Sullivan's avatar

Those correspondences are really kind of eerie… The American undermind.

Expand full comment
Caleb Crain's avatar

My working theory is that Emerson was the advance guard of the American Renaissance—that he saw all the literary possibilities, before anyone else, but maybe because he was trained as a minister, decided on a fairly narrow and abstract path for himself. There's also a series of entries where he basically maps out Thoreau's whole literary and intellectual career long before he even met Thoreau.

Expand full comment
John Jeremiah Sullivan's avatar

Please tell me you're writing a book that will elaborate this theory?

Expand full comment
Caleb Crain's avatar

I’ll add it to the list of books I should write!

Expand full comment
John Jeremiah Sullivan's avatar

Hahah... Heard. This one should get pride of place, though.

Expand full comment
Primitivo Orosco's avatar

I always saw the novel as a metaphor for the USA. Always and for ever searching for enemy’s , always ending at the bottom of the sea. I understand my readings is not even scratching the surface of this great novel. So i will make the journey once’s more. Wish me luck.

Expand full comment
Gerald Howard's avatar

For your next assignment, Mr. Crain, I would like you to draw out the correspondences between MOBY-DICK and, ahem, WHITE NOISE.

Have you actually read every word or even most of the words in CLAREL? If so, dude . . . .

Such a lovely piece. Thank you for writing it. Decades ago I put WHITE-JACKET in print in a Signet Classics edition. It is strange how few very literate people are not aware of TYPEE, OMOO, BENITO CERENO, etc.

Expand full comment
Caleb Crain's avatar

Lol, it’s been a few decades since I read “White Noise” so I’m due for a re-read! Indeed I have read every word of “Clarel,” and will even argue that it’s great in its very odd and cryptic way. Wrote about it in my essay “Melville’s Secrets.” Once you give in and accept the Miltonic sentence structures and the bristly texture, the weird emotional miasma is mesmerizing. Co-sign on the early Melville novels needing more play!

Expand full comment
LAWRENCE HALL's avatar

I cheered for the whale.

Expand full comment
Russell Seitz's avatar

Before overthinking further , read the Knickerbocker original and spend a winter in Bequia learning the harpooner's trade

https://x.com/RussellSeitz/status/1955814987651272870

Expand full comment
Bruce Brittain's avatar

Wow! I read Moby Dick again several years ago as a well-seasoned adult and was just as flummoxed by the ordeal as I was as a HS senior. I'm all about good dialogue, believable dialogue and admire writers who can craft it so that its doesn't get in the way. Nobody talks or has ever talked the way these characters do. Neither Melville nor Pat Conroy has the knack. I'll stick with Larry McMurtry's earlier stuff.

Expand full comment